My session proposal is this. . . . and could be combined with what was just posted–
That in addiion to learning about Omeka next weekend. . . interested others will also want to discuss those “other” platforms or delivery systems that Omeka is at the “crossroads” of:
(1) Web Content Management Systems such as WordPress, Drupal, Joomla
(2) Library and Archival Repository and Digital Collections Systems such as Fedora, Dspace, Greenstone, CONTENTdm
(3) Museum Collections Management and Online Exhibition Systems, such as PastPerfect
How do these alternative content management systems compare to Omeka? In what situations might they be more effective or an alternative? How does one know when an alternative system might be appropriate for academic or other use?
I’m familiar with the Fedora operating system project, is this what you mean?
I am referring to Fedora Commons Repository Software for managing, preserving, and linking digital content. Site: fedora-commons.org/
There may be a connection, though, between the two; I am not sure.
I would also be interested in comparisons and experiences with “most appropriate/effective use” in different educational contexts.
Aloha, friends. I, too, would love to talk thru the various pros and cons of different CMS. I build custom WordPress installs regularly, so I’m able to contribute what it can do and, perhaps more important, what it cannot!